- #DIGITAL PERFORMER 8 VS CUBASE 7 FOR MAC#
- #DIGITAL PERFORMER 8 VS CUBASE 7 MAC#
- #DIGITAL PERFORMER 8 VS CUBASE 7 WINDOWS#
Motu says the program "appear to be compatible with Windows 11, although final compatibility testing is still ongoing" as of last October, but has yet to fully certify it. Motu sells Digital Performer in a single $499 version that works on any system running either macOS (version 10.13 and up) or Windows 10. How Much Does Motu Digital Performer Cost? This latest version is a true pleasure to work with-that is, as long as you're not expecting much in the way of bundled virtual instruments.
#DIGITAL PERFORMER 8 VS CUBASE 7 MAC#
I've been using Digital Performer on and off for 30 years, with my first experience being with the MIDI-only Performer in a college music lab on a Mac IIsi. In the digital audio-enabled version's 11th iteration, Motu's flagship DAW remains a premier tool for MIDI composition and film scoring, and it contains enough audio-editing tools to serve as a solid all-around multitrack recorder. It's an excellent package and well worth the asking price.If there's a single digital audio workstation package that's more closely associated with the Mac than any other, it's Motu's Digital Performer. Working with Digital Performer is one of the most satisfying experiences we've ever had with a DAW, and we can totally understand why anyone might want to jump ship to it from another one. Those complaints aside, there's a massive amount of power and flexibility here. Also, it lacks a combined Instrument track - virtual instruments require both an audio and a MIDI track to work. Some are excellent and unusual, but a decent ROMpler is notable by its absence. If it comes up short anywhere, it's in the bundled instruments.
It is different, certainly, and it takes some getting used to, especially if you've spent a lot of time with the likes of Reaper or Sonar. It's a mature, well-defined DAW that is on an equal footing with any of its competitors. We're impressed with Digital Performer 8.
#DIGITAL PERFORMER 8 VS CUBASE 7 FOR MAC#
And of note for Mac users is the fact that DP's GUI is now built 100% on Cocoa. Upgraders, meanwhile, will surely dig Punch Guard, a sort of "look ahead" tool for recording that ensures that anything played before or after a punch-in/out will be captured as well, just in case. Chunks, Songs and Sequences aren't new to DP, but newcomers will be shocked by just how different DP8 can be to the competition. However, it would be a mistake to overlook its potential as an album mastering tool. It's a very flexible system, but one that can be daunting to the uninitiated. This is all primarily aimed at film and game composers, it should be said, and the average musician may never actually come into contact with any of it. You can also use V-Racks (which are also considered to be Chunks) to create a central set of instruments and effects plugins (a mastering suite, for example) to be tapped by the various other Chunks in play. Thus, you can work on different versions of the same project at the same time, swapping, reordering and rearranging them, or arrange songs into an album. Digital Performer allows you to use multiple Sequences in the same project, and any number of Sequences and Songs (called Chunks in this context) can be arranged in the Song window. "Newcomers will be shocked by just how different DP8 can be to the competition" You can access timestretching, beat-matching and an excellent in-line Melodyne-style pitch correction "layer". Additional views include Waveform, the superb Mixing Board, MIDI, Score and Meter Bridge to name but a few. The Tracks view is akin to the project overview that sits above the arrangement view in some other DAWs - except that, in this case, you can copy, paste and move things around directly within it. However, much of this can also be handled in the less cluttered Tracks view, which you can have open at the same time. Chunky styleĪt its simplest, Digital Performer can be configured to resemble the likes of Cubase or Logic, with most audio, recording, automation and macro editing taking place in a single view called Sequence. That's a clear indication of the diligence and UI design craft employed by the developers.
We prefer the latter approach - DP8's consolidated window is surprisingly uncluttered, even with eight panes active on a laptop screen. In many areas, though, it follows the standards adhered to by most other DAWs, sporting multiple simultaneous and customisable views that can be floated or used in a consolidated window. DP unashamedly goes its own way, and some of MOTU's nomenclature can be baffling at first. However, those moving over from the competition might well be in for a bit of head scratching. If you've used previous versions of Digital Performer, DP8's interface will hold few surprises.
0 kommentar(er)
